Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would assume, to reduce speed, maintain glideslope, etc...

 

I don't particularly, not for $3,200 at least! All though they do look pretty snarky.

 

But I am curious to know if anyone had implemented strake mounted speed brakes vs. the belly board.

Posted

Steve:

 

One of the things you have to remember about canard aircraft is that there is a relationship between the front wing and the back wing. You mess that relationship up and Your canard is no longer a stall proof nose bobbing sleek eze to land plane. It could easily turn it into a large lawn dart. I am not saying it can't be done but at what expense and why is it necessary? These planes if set up right can drop like a rock if you need to loose some altitude fast. I used to do it in my Longeze all the time. I road with Marc Z. at Rough River last year we were a little high on final he cranked it over on its side and started a beautiful slip it dropped like the proverbial rock and we landed right on the numbers. Why do we need speed brakes in the wings? STeve build on.

Steve Harmon

Lovin Life in Idaho

Cozy IV Plans #1466 N232CZ

http://websites.expercraft.com/bigsteve/

Working on Chapter 19,21

Posted

Steve:

 

One of the things you have to remember about canard aircraft is that there is a relationship between the front wing and the back wing. You mess that relationship up and Your canard is no longer a stall proof nose bobbing sleek eze to land plane. It could easily turn it into a large lawn dart. I am not saying it can't be done but at what expense and why is it necessary? These planes if set up right can drop like a rock if you need to loose some altitude fast. I used to do it in my Longeze all the time. I road with Marc Z. at Rough River last year we were a little high on final he cranked it over on its side and started a beautiful slip it dropped like the proverbial rock and we landed right on the numbers. Why do we need speed brakes in the wings? STeve build on.

Additionally you have rudders that can both be deployed outward

I Canardly contain myself!

Rich :D

Posted

All though they do look pretty snarky.

 

In the eye of the beholder I guess. Lots of snarky that can't fly too. Snarky is as snarky does.
Posted

those look cool, but unnecessarily heavy and complex.

If this were a standard LongEZ with fixed gear and prop, I would totally agree.

 

However, in this particular case, they are highly desirable, maybe even mandatory. The aircraft in this photo is equipped with a turbine engine and has retractable gear. Very difficult to slow this plane down without the use of the drag devices.

 

As for the Mooney style flip ups. Very desirable if you own a Mooney. Mainly, to get the airplane slowed down to gear speed. Once the gear is hanging in the breeze, the drag devices are virtually useless.

 

The problem with the LongEZ isn't slowing down to gear speed, as the gear is already "Down and Glued" :-).

 

The problem is, even with the LongEZs gear hanging down, the aircraft is still to aerodynamically clean to allow for a normal approach angle when landing. However, with the drag device (landing brake) deployed, a normal approach angle can now be performed in the LongEZ.

 

Waiter

F16 performance on a Piper Cub budget

LongEZ, 160hp, MT CS Prop, Downdraft cooling, Full retract

visit: www.iflyez.com

Posted

The old cliche applies Keep It Simple. I have a few hundred hours in a Cozy IV and did not need anything this complex or expensive.

Posted

The mindset sometimes seems- that this airplane needs 'fixing'.

 

One of the latest was revamping the canard attach points..despite them working just fine.

Another, redoing the rudder cables in cabon fiber.. despite the plans version not having any issues.

Yet another is heavier stainless steel brake lines.. again the nylaflow are lighter and without issue.

Or maybe a steerable nose wheel.. Lots of turn on a dime performance with plans braking turnability.

Or a 3000mile bladder..now this would be appealing...for both me, my wife and the airplane.

 

Heck I'm not immune- I just finished my FHC- so the shoe sometimes fits- and I wear it.=/

Self confessed Wingnut.

Now think about it...wouldn't you rather LIVE your life, rather than watch someone else's, on Reality T.V.?

Get up off that couch!!! =)

 

Progress; Fuselage on all three, with outside and inside nearly complete. 8 inch extended nose. FHC done. Canard finished. ERacer wings done with blended winglets. IO540 starting rebuild. Mounting Spar. Starting strake ribs.

Posted

Heck I'm not immune- I just finished my FHC- so the shoe sometimes fits- and I wear it.=/

Same here... I just read Marc Zeitlin mention that he's never heard of a Cozy Mark IV canopy warping due to temp changes like the Long-EZ (with the very long plexiglass) does. So no special carbon for me!

Jon Matcho :busy:
Builder & Canard Zone Admin
Now:  Rebuilding Quickie Tri-Q200 N479E
Next:  Resume building a Cozy Mark IV

Posted

If you do do a FHC- I would suggest some CF on the inside and outside- but maybe I read your post wrong.

Post scrip to my previous post is that by and large the airplane DOES NOT need any 'fixing'....and could be the perceived cure is worse than the perceived symptoms.

Self confessed Wingnut.

Now think about it...wouldn't you rather LIVE your life, rather than watch someone else's, on Reality T.V.?

Get up off that couch!!! =)

 

Progress; Fuselage on all three, with outside and inside nearly complete. 8 inch extended nose. FHC done. Canard finished. ERacer wings done with blended winglets. IO540 starting rebuild. Mounting Spar. Starting strake ribs.

Posted

You all misunderstood my question. I asked if it anyone had done it, and stated, for $3,200, I wasn't considering it.

 

Sometimes questions can be answered w/a yes or no, not a lecture on why it's not necessary to improve the design.

Posted

I think everybody understood it.

Self confessed Wingnut.

Now think about it...wouldn't you rather LIVE your life, rather than watch someone else's, on Reality T.V.?

Get up off that couch!!! =)

 

Progress; Fuselage on all three, with outside and inside nearly complete. 8 inch extended nose. FHC done. Canard finished. ERacer wings done with blended winglets. IO540 starting rebuild. Mounting Spar. Starting strake ribs.

Posted

Has anyone considered adding aerodynamic speed brakes to the strakes or wings?

Yes!

 

Yes!

 

Lancair sells their assembly for $3,200, but surely it can be made/acquired for less.

Yes!

 

 

Waiter

F16 performance on a Piper Cub budget

LongEZ, 160hp, MT CS Prop, Downdraft cooling, Full retract

visit: www.iflyez.com

Posted

Has anyone considered adding aerodynamic speed brakes to the strakes or wings?

 

Something like this perhaps: http://preciseflight.com/products/speedbrakes/mooney_m20

 

 

http://preciseflight.com/products/speedbrakes/experimental

 

Lancair sells their assembly for $3,200, but surely it can be made/acquired for less.

You wanted an answer you shall recieve it. NO NOT NOW NOT EVER question answered Steve Build on

Steve Harmon

Lovin Life in Idaho

Cozy IV Plans #1466 N232CZ

http://websites.expercraft.com/bigsteve/

Working on Chapter 19,21

Posted

You wanted an answer you shall recieve it. NO NOT NOW NOT EVER question answered Steve Build on

If you see him, don't ever piss this guy off. By the way Steve, did I ever thank you for the hammer at Rough River?
Posted

Big Steve- in caps- I guess you REALLY never considered them!

Drag brakes on the wing instead of the belly board? Havent considered, but maybe throw eccentrics 'dame edna ' cat out there on final, and see if it helps. Plenty o' 'drag' happening there.:P

 

I had at one time thought of putting holes in the belly board- but didnt think long about it.

Self confessed Wingnut.

Now think about it...wouldn't you rather LIVE your life, rather than watch someone else's, on Reality T.V.?

Get up off that couch!!! =)

 

Progress; Fuselage on all three, with outside and inside nearly complete. 8 inch extended nose. FHC done. Canard finished. ERacer wings done with blended winglets. IO540 starting rebuild. Mounting Spar. Starting strake ribs.

Posted

I had at one time thought of putting holes in the belly board- but didnt think long about it.

 

I thought of doing something similar or maybe two outside the airflow to the NACA inlet. Just more complex, not necessary, and more time I can't spend flying the thing.
Posted

Steve, if fat letters is all the anger you posess, no damage done. Anyone who knows you know you're a good kid.

 

Sorry about the pitot tube. Maybe sometimes you just need to put the chain saw down and pick up a sawsall....kidding.;)

Posted

Steves such a do-it-yourselfer...

I was going tomake a jab at him being more careful.

Good thing it was his pitot line and not his vas deferens.

bada- boom.

btw- Steve- I liked those fotos you emailed me....the folks here might like to see your foam top finished.

also- anybody who is having trouble with actually working on their plane, instead of talking about it..should not get near Steve- as his building pace will shame you to no end.=]

Self confessed Wingnut.

Now think about it...wouldn't you rather LIVE your life, rather than watch someone else's, on Reality T.V.?

Get up off that couch!!! =)

 

Progress; Fuselage on all three, with outside and inside nearly complete. 8 inch extended nose. FHC done. Canard finished. ERacer wings done with blended winglets. IO540 starting rebuild. Mounting Spar. Starting strake ribs.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information