wolf. Posted April 17, 2008 Posted April 17, 2008 Hi, anybody who can give me an insight on the rotamax rotary engines. On the paper they look good, light and powerfull, how about rael life?? Quote Cosy Classic flying (ex LX-ACE) Varieze N39JC rebuilding
Spodman Posted April 17, 2008 Posted April 17, 2008 Erm, its an attractive line drawing. Apparently the 3D CAD models are coming soon!!! Quote Mark Spedding - SpodmanDarraweit Guim - AustraliaCozy IV #1331 - Chapter 09www.mykitlog.com/Spodmanwww.sites.google.com/site/thespodplane/the-spodplane
triple7driver Posted July 21, 2008 Posted July 21, 2008 Attention Rotomax haters, Here ya go ......http://www.contactmagazine.com/backissu.html#current I hope Herr Zeitlin takes note as well. Cheers, Randy Quote
Edge 513 Posted July 21, 2008 Posted July 21, 2008 Erm, triple7, you might want to edit your post...Marc is not German- he is of Jewish lineage. Seems your assumptions are not limited...to a companys claims, or his heritage. Quote Self confessed Wingnut. Now think about it...wouldn't you rather LIVE your life, rather than watch someone else's, on Reality T.V.? Get up off that couch!!! =) Progress; Fuselage on all three, with outside and inside nearly complete. 8 inch extended nose. FHC done. Canard finished. ERacer wings done with blended winglets. IO540 starting rebuild. Mounting Spar. Starting strake ribs.
triple7driver Posted July 21, 2008 Posted July 21, 2008 I think this information would certainly end the SPECULATION that this engine is nothing more than a line drawing. As for Zeitlin I guess "His exalted all knowingest" would be a more appropriate preamble as he openly espoused that this engine would ever fly. Quote
Marc Zeitlin Posted July 21, 2008 Posted July 21, 2008 I think this information would certainly end the SPECULATION that this engine is nothing more than a line drawing. As for Zeitlin I guess "His exalted all knowingest" would be a more appropriate preamble as he openly espoused that this engine would ever fly.Because your memory seems to be somewhat impaired, I've copied my original statment regarding these engines from the other thread on the "Aceair Aeriks", which is where it was originally posted: "Tell you what - if there's a 180 HP version of this engine (independently verified on a Dyno) that's lasted 1000 hours of running within the next 5 years (by 12/31/2012), I'll give you $100. If not, you give me a case of Guinness (yes, I've been burned on a bet like that before, by a non-entity who backed out after losing), but I'm a sucker for sure things." Given that (according to Patrick's article in the latest Sport Aviation) the 180 HP version hasn't run yet, much less flown, my statement still stands. I'm perfectly willing to lose $100 - I'd be happy if they're successful and present an alternative motor that works and is reliable. The 65 and 110/120 HP versions, I don't have a lot of doubt about. The 180 HP version - well, you can see what I think above. Read a little more carefully next time. Quote Marc J. Zeitlin Burnside Aerospace marc_zeitlin@alum.mit.edu www.cozybuilders.org copyright © 2024
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.