Jump to content

Voidhawk9

Verified Members
  • Posts

    350
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Posts posted by Voidhawk9

  1. Tricky, but not impossible.

    For as new type of conversion, mounting it on something slow and rugged would be a safer start. If it is a 'proven' conversion, then by all means. Just know what you are getting into, but this is experimental aviation, after all.

  2. Hi Larry.

    I'm in New Zealand, not Thailand, but we share some similar problems. 

    I'm building a (modified) Cozy IV, but haven't ever flown a Cozy. I did get to see a couple and fly in a Berkut and Velocity while in the States a couple of months ago (pandemic spamdemic!). If the design / configuration is one that excites you and you have a passion to build, go for it! It is a lot more time and effort than one of those kits, but to me it's worth it - I look forward to flying it very much, but I really enjoy the building too!

    I'm 6'4", and am confident I can build the canopy to suit.

    I have sourced equivalent materials here for much of the raw stock. Foam, BID, epoxy, no problem. Hardware, Cozy-specific parts, and UNI glass I have imported from the USA so far, though I haven't had to get any 'big' parts yet. Colan in Australia has some some good glass options, and I believe is the new spar tape supplier for Spruce anyway.

    You're clearly the 'builder' type. Have you done much composite work yet? I hadn't, so I did a couple of small projects with the stuff first to make sure I enjoyed it. I did!

  3. The study uses are Reynolds number of 1000. The Reynolds number on our use cases is in the millions. Not really applicable.

     

    Varying the inlet has been shown to provide little or no gain for cooling, provided it is large enough to begin with. Varying the exit does help, but mainly to reduce drag when you are going fast and flow is enough with the exit reduced. The keys, as Kent has shown many times, are pressure differential (ie flow will actually move from inlet to outlet - you may be surprised how unwilling it is to do so in the somewhat chaotic flows at the aft end of these airplanes) and ensuring the air only goes where it needs to with proper working baffles.

  4. Another consideration is that the prop creates a pressure wave (it is a wing after all) that briefly blocks airflow flowing past it. Look at most props near the root where our cowl exits are; it is thick and rounded, it isn't moving much air back from the cowl exits!

    Apparently having the cowl opening further away (cut back away from the prop) reduces this issue.

    Air being a fluid will always flow via the least restrictive route (thus the need for baffles to force it through the cooling fins). And, it will flow from high to low pressure. If there is high pressure at your exit for any reason (and the aft end of bodies can be a bit chaotic in this regard), flow will be reduced. It might be interesting to experiment with a small 'flap' sticking outwards at the cowl exit to induce a low pressure behind it as a dignostic tool to determine if this makes a notable difference.

    If there is constriction on the flow, it will slow or stop entirely. As an illustration, open a door (or window) on each side of your house (or other closed in building) on a windy day with the wind blowing towards one opening. Varying the opening of the exit side will clearly throttle the flow through the house.

    As Barry noted as well, the air gets heated on the way through, so there is a greater volume to exit than enter!

  5. It isn't really US carriers that are the concern, nor here in NZ. It is the places that put pilots with absolutely minimum time and experience in the cockpit, and especially those people when they move up to captains and have someone with equally little experience beside them. So many pilot 'sausage factories' teach to pass the exams (even to the extent of memorizing question banks), not to create the best pilots.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information