Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would weight an balance allow for an engine like the rotax 914 UL in a Q2(00)? i'm really starting to like these planes and was thinking a single place Q2 and more fuel. hopefully rotax will be around for a while, add a constant speed prop and i think i would have one heck of a fun plane.

thanks for any replies

  • 12 years later...
Posted

I always say that there's nothing wrong with replying to a post from the distant past, so here we go.

I think the Rotax 912 and 914 engines would work well in a Q2 airframe. I was considering converting my Tri-Q200 project to a Rotax, but these engines are not cheap. 

Since 2008 Rotax has established itself in the LSA market, and I noticed that most of the CS prop manufacturers favor Rotax at the 100 HP range over direct-drive Continental or Lycoming engines.

Jon Matcho :busy:
Builder & Canard Zone Admin
Now:  Rebuilding Quickie Tri-Q200 N479E
Next:  Resume building a Cozy Mark IV

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information