Jump to content

DemonFrog

Members
  • Posts

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DemonFrog

  1. Moving back to the topic at hand, most people want distance nowadays, a less effecient engine causing the plane to go 633nm may not be what most people want, with 100LL getting more espensive, people want cheap fuel and they want to burn less of it. Put a more effecient engine in that plane giving it more range (1k is nice) and potential sales will no doubt go up. overhaul costs may be higher in a piston engine, but when you burn less fuel, it may be worth it over 2k hours as opposed to 3k using more fuel.

    just a newbie diesel lover's perspective.

    (distance AND speed)

    Just thought i would add something about mission weight. An engine that burns more fuel will need more of said fuel for the same trip, possibly offsetting any benefit of the lighter engine. So it is quite possible that a piston engine producing the same hp as a lighter rotary will have a lighter mission weight (say to travel 800nm). I'm not completely discounting rotary engines, heck they seem like a really neat engine that would be amazing for twin tractor operations (small cowling) but i like to go far.

    David

  2. directly from their website:

    OVERVIEW OF STATUS

     

    April, 2007.

     

    FAA Certification Progresses

    DeltaHawk is on its way to type certification of the DH-180A4 engine (180 HP). An FAA

    Designated Engineering Representative consulting group, The DERs Group, has been engaged to

    manage and direct the process. Current estimates are to achieve Type Certification (TC) as early

    as the end of 2008.

     

    Essential elements of DeltaHawk’s Project Specific Certification Plan (PSCP) were submitted to

    the FAA early this year. Revisions are currently underway to prepare the document for final FAA approval. The PSCP will become the guiding document for achieving DeltaHawk’s initial Type

    Certificate for the DH-180A4 engine. The remaining engine model variants will come quickly

    afterwards as amendments to the initial TC.

  3. I am just used to nosewheel steering i guess, piper apache taxis nicely on grass, no problems, and the program i am in for getting my license uses seminoles and zlin 242s both steerable. i guess my other issue is i feel like i would be losing take off effeciency by having to brake.

     

    Heck i'm adaptable, i still think my first hombuilt (at least first composite) s going to be either the velo or ez, just depends on what my requirements are when i finally have money (college student)

     

    i should also add that i am willing to learn :D

  4. I have searched the velocity website high and low, and i can not find out how they stear the darn thing. Is it steerable nosewheel or is it castoring with brakes?

     

    could very well be the deciding factor between a velocity and an open-ez

     

    thanks

    David

  5. My First post here. I'm 19 and have to go through college yet (Sault College: aviation) I plan on building a long ez someday, in fact i've mentally committed myself to it (only way) What i would like to modify in my ez are a fair amount of the Berkut mods and a Deltahawk diesel liquid cooled engine. I just wish there was an Open-Berkut design (hint hint ;) ) i may also do some other minor design changes with the help of my father (engineer :scared: ) has anyone done a glass cockpit in an EZ?

    Mostly just dreaming here, but keep up the good work i really appreciate that you guys are keeping these cool (and effecient) designs going.:D

    Thank you

    David

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information