Jump to content

H.Zwakenberg

Members
  • Posts

    128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by H.Zwakenberg

  1. Hi Group,

     

    for my IBIS project I've changed my thinking about what avionics I want and why I want it. You can read more about it on this page:

    http://ibis.experimentals.de/progress/panel/navigation/navigation.html

     

    So I've been scrounging around and ended up with most of what I'm going to need.

     

    Back to my question:

     

    I'm looking for documentation about the King KLN90 GPS unit. It's a KLN90, not a KLN90b.

    What I ended up with is a KLN90 and a user's manual for the KLN90b.

    What I'm currently looking for is a user's manual for the KLN90 as well as interfacing documentation to be able to integrate it into my project.

     

    If anyone can point me to sources for this information, I'd be very grateful indeed!

     

    bye

    Hans

  2. Definitely don't call it a Long-Eze, or an Open-Eze for that matter (The VariEze is the only EZ that went with 'E-z-e' vs. simply 'EZ'). ;)

     

    In terms of protection, registering it something other than a Long-EZ is protecting Burt Rutan. Until then, I think it's fine to say "I'm building a Long-EZ." The point is that when you end up registering with the proper authority, consider something similar to these:

    • Fryer Open-EZ
    • Fryer Tandem Canard
    • Fryer EZ
    • Fryer Speed Demon
    • Fryer Model 1
    My $0.02.

     

    Jon,

     

    protecting Burt is only a first line of defense. What happens if the sh*t hits the fan and you really screw up in a plane that you have been calling a Long-EZ, or whatever other name that alludes to RAF. You can count on RAF, Burt or both of them to go after the builder, if only to clear their names....

     

    In this context, giving your project an entirely different name is also self protection...

     

    bye

    Hans

  3. Well, it won't be a speed demon, and there would probably be only about 50 safe flying days a year in Mojave for this plane. Then, again, the same could be said for almost all LSA type planes. The concept is still bouncing around his head, so I'd rather not....

     

    Would that be a very light solar- and fuel cell powered plane - with the 50 safe days in Mojave you are alluding to being the turbulence such a light structure would need to endure on all other days...?

     

    Just guessing.... :)

     

    bye

    Hans

  4. Hi Group,

     

    Mid-July I finally had the chance to attend the French RSA Fly-in and spend a weekend with IBIS-builders and -planes.

     

    Jean Claude offered training on the IBIS, which motivated me even more to get into my car and drive down to Roanne and Vichy for the weekend.

     

    You can read all about it on:

    My first four IBIS flights

     

    If I get around doing it, I'll also publish an article about each of the four flights and about IBIS flying qualities.

     

    take care,

    Hans

    New

    Jean Claude, the co-designer, is to the best of my knowlegde not a member of this board, but he is visiting this board occasionally.

     

    I met JC a couple of weeks ago during the French RSA Fly-in. He reaffirmed his position, that the basic design will not be taken into new directions. His focus is on incremental refinement of details - not on deriving entirely new concepts from it.

     

    cheers,

    Hans

  5. Hi Dave,

     

    thanks a lot for those great pointers and explanations. It's a 35 year old building - including the double garage - and we don't have information on exactly how it was built.

    My friend the architect explained a lot about best practices at the time, but that's not helping me a lot.

    I'm not going to dig out the outside and seal it there. It would be best - no doubt about that - but that's just too much effort. After all, it's a work shop, not a living quarters. Also, since the floor slab is cast directly on sand, only insulating the slab edges is not going to amount to much. If there were a cellar below the slab, it's the way to go; it's standard practice over here...

    My big concern is to create problems elsewhere by sealing the concrete floor from the inside. I could envision a scenario, whereby moisture/vapor that normally diffuses through the floor (if this is happening at all...), would then only have the walls on the sides to evaporate. I could see how this - long term - would attack the substance of the walls.

     

    Did I get it right, that you used a sealer below the epoxy floor paint? Wouldn't the epoxy be a enough of a sealer?

     

    fly safe

    Hans

  6. Hi group,

     

    on my IBIS project website I've added a few pages about what I did to turn a cold double garage into a suitable workshop. So far the walls and ceiling were treated this way.

     

    I'm still unsure about how to treat the concrete floor. It's cast directly on the sand and consequently it gets very cold (and I assume it may also diffuse moisture from below).

     

    Any ideas what to do about it?

     

    take care

    Hans

  7. Hi Jon,

     

    hopefully the number of progress reports will increase! Taking over another project is a great way to get a head start which I hope to be able to leverage now that I finally started renovating my double garage.... It's been too long that I postponed this job...

     

    As to your question about those Google ads: for me it's more a matter of learning about them than needing it. My IBIS site is only used to test new concepts before employing them on other sites. To make it not too intrusive, 95% of the pages have but a single block, almost always on the same location. For visitors with rather low resolution displays you might have a point, as the single ad block will show up more prominently above the fold there. I'm either on a 1600x1200 or 1280x1024 display, so it's not taking too much screen real estate. I think I'm going to keep my test-bed, because so far I learned a lot from it.

     

    bye

    Hans

  8. Hi Group,

     

    it's time for a progress report: last week I took over a partially completed IBIS project. The French builder (Mr. F. Dulin) had had his project on halt for more than three years.

     

    The wood-working part on the fuselage is about three-quarters ready, the same goes for the canard wing. The winglets/directional control surfaces are probably less than 50% ready. The main gear Ash laminate is finished. The main wing is not started yet. Apart from the bottom inside of the fuselage, nothing was covered with plywood yet, so that I still had the chance to inspect everything thoroughly.

     

    Apart from the stuff mentioned above, the deal included all the wood need to complete the entire aircraft - main wing including. Still missing in the materials department are the instruments, avionics and engine. Other than that, I pretty much have all I need to complete the ship.

     

    I've put some pictures and descriptions on my RJ.03 IBIS homebuilt aircraft web pages, go to 'progress' and check out the sections about the fuselage and the landing gear. I'll add information about the canard wing sometime next week.

     

    Enjoy!

     

    Hans

  9. Hi Group,

     

    out of curiosity, I started to assemble a list of known IBIS completions. If you point your browser to my IBIS homebuilt aircraft project page, you'll find the completions as a submenu under 'nice to know'. Please excuse me for not pointing you directly to the RJ.03 IBIS completions page; sometimes my ISP apparently has intermittent problems with deep linking...

     

    The current IBIS completions list is tiny by any measure. It reflects that many builders indeed need quite a few years to complete their project. The list should grow more rapidly now. A case in point is 2006. One maiden flight so far and two more completions that will probably make their maiden flight this year. If these come through, 2006 will have been the best IBIS year to date, showing that momentum is increasing.

     

    As I wrote, the list is tiny by any measure; please take into consideration that the European homebuilder scene cannot be compared with the US situation.

     

    Take care, fly safe!

     

    bye

    Hans

  10. Hi group,

     

    last week I got confirmation of the fact that an American had had no problem whatsoever to get an existing license transferred to him.

    JC apparently was very cooperative.

    So, as long as no new plans are sold into the US, hunting down a stopped project might be the way to go if you intend to build an Ibis.

     

    Just a thought.

     

    cheers,

    Hans

  11. Hi Group,

     

    well, are you? From their website:

     

    "PocketFMS is a constantly developing software Flight Management System package for Windows PC's and Pocket PC's, which will assist you with flight planning and during flight execution.

    Once connected to a GPS receiver, PocketFMS's Moving Map feature will guide you safely through any flight, be it in Europe, Australia, Asia, the US, wherever. Your present position is clearly displayed on the Moving Map, as well as your track, heading, speed, altitude etc. The Moving Map also displays the location of beacons, airports, restricted areas, frequencies, elevations and, basically, anything you select to be displayed."

     

    Now get this: IT'S FREE FOR ANYONE TO DOWNLOAD ;)

     

    This sounds like a plug for a project created by a fellow Dutchman (and it probably is...;) ) but hey, I like it...

     

    take care & fly safely

     

    Hans

  12. Hi group,

     

    can someone please give me some information on what to look out for when inspecting a DragonFly? Are there common pitfalls to look out for; maintainance issues that often are not dealt with; etc. ?

     

    What are the usual telltales that should persuade one to pass on an offer. Any flight behavior that is common with badly built DF's? Any empty weight threshold that tells you this build is 'overdone'?

     

    All help appreciated. The reason for my enquiry: I'll be inspecting a DF shortly, one that has been built in the US, and -hardly- been operated in Europe. The ship has only a few hours on it, which makes me rather weary. Why would an experimental that's been around for a few years only be flown for a couple of hours? Also, it has been on the market for more than a year and obviously no one so far touched it.

     

    thanks,

    Hans

     

     

    P.S. no, I'm not quitting my IBIS project, I'm just looking for a temporary solution to a commuting problem I currently have to deal with...

  13. Contact Trade a plane and subscribe to the newspaper. there may be some there. Baring that, ask someone who deals in canard aircraft near you, like an EAA member. The last option, contact the IBIS people in France__ mabye they will be more amicable to you than us people here in the USA.

    S. Williams

     

    It's extremely unlikely that you'll find someone willing to sell her/his Ibis for two reasons:

    - the number of completions is still very low, probably in the low teens at the most, with a few first flights about to happen in France.

    - it's a very economical aircraft to operate. If you'd sell your Ibis, a replacement will likely be less economical.

     

    bye

    Hans

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information