-
Posts
119 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Articles
CSA Articles
CSA Issues
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by bferrell
-
-
That's not correct Mark, the Amaradillo powered racer, N205MB flew the last week of August and is now the preferred engine:I believe that the picture you show of 246RR is either photoshopped or just has the prop removed and a nozzle placed temporarily for the photoshoot.
N216MR is the Velocity that flew with the XCOR motor at OSH this year, and is the only RR racing aircraft flying with a rocket at this time. There's a picture of it flying on page 39 of this month's Sport Aviation.
N246RR is the prop driven aircraft they use for training.
'"This will now be the primary engine for the next rocket racers," said Granger Whitelaw, CEO and co-founder of the RRL. The league is building five rockets so that it will have six by next spring.'
Armadillo Flys
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-10027365-76.html.
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=Rocket_Racer_N216MR XCor
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=Rocket_Racer_N205MB Armadillo
-
To be clear, I think this is the trainer aircraft, not one of the rocket-powered Velocitys.
http://n44vf.velocityxl.com/builder/n246rr.jpg
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/images/3/30/N246rrosh2.jpg
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=Rocket_Racer_N246RR
-
For those interested, I've posted our initial report on our emergency off-field landing on the way to Rough River this weekend.
http://n44vf.velocityxl.com/incident.php
Brett
-
I found the news article:
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2008809280516
That was some flying there at the end! Way to go Elizabeth
Even found a good parking place.
Well, there isn't any scheduled service to Otisco, and we were thinking of setting something up...
Can you believe they didn't have valet?
Just goes to show you that a Velocity can merge with traffic, everyone just has to agree that fast, pointy aircraft invariably get the right-of-way.
Seriously, we know folks have questions, and we have answers, so stay tuned.
B
-
Well, apparently I shouldn't poke fun at the gear... went to depart and the right brake was lame... hopefully just needs to be bled and we can get there still, but we'll see...
-
{virtual rimshot}
-
Thanks! We're gearing up....
-
Mack was trying to avoid the houses, declared so on the radio, we're not sure why he hit the house, but I'm confident he was doing what he could given the situation.does seem strange that an experienced pilot would not aim for a street instead of a house.
-
Current speculation is that the supercharger was a positive displacement type, which would starve the engine of air if the belt failed, but that's just folks talking possibilities.
B
-
The Cincinnati FSDO regularly gives this kind of op limit without ill effect, mine is in fact. We have lots of clear flat land here, and my limits were 75 nm, stay in Ohio, out of Cincinnati, Dayton, and Columbus' airspace, but I could go to any airport not limited by the preceding.I would like to know why was the aircraft was flown from three airports in only 5 hours of flight. it may be that they had switched the phase one airport of operation during the 5 hours but I doubt it. I have seen the FAA give phase one restrictions to some Lancair owners that did not include there route of flight to the test area and allowed them to land at other airports. this type of test operation can only end up bad.
I do not want to see the FAA telling us which airport we can use our experimental aircraft. one way to prevent this is to use some common sense and as the pilot of a low time aircraft not operate in high risk areas as N Las Vegas. Why would you want to take off and fly over houses at 300 feet in an experimental with only 5 hours? seems the pilot did not act responsibly in this case and never gave any consideration to the what if of operating a new plane.
B
-
It's N415MK (Killgore), but is seems perhaps someone else was aboard, and it had very few (5?) hours on it. Still desperately trying to find out who was piloting.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i...bsu0wD92NM24G0
B
-
-
The Velocity is ZU-CYJ of Marco Schmidt (a Long Wing "173" RG)
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=ZU-CYJ
His site is at http://www.usda.co.za/
-
Reading the prelim on this raises the hair on the back of my neck.
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20080804X01148&key=1According to an eyewitness located at the bottom of the 100 foot deep rock quarry, he could hear the engine of the airplane when it flew at high speed through the quarry at approximately 20 to 30 feet above the floor before it collided with the wall of the quarry and exploded.
A second witness reported that the airplane flew directly at his large bulldozer on the far side of the one mile wide quarry. The witness estimated the airplane was at 30 feet above the floor of the quarry when he waved at the airplane as it flew past him. The pilot then banked to the right away from his bulldozer and nosed up to miss a large dirt pile, but then collided with the quarry wall about 20 feet from the floor of the quarry.
-
Just FYI, at Oshkosh the "Split" Kits were back, you could even buy one wing at a time. From memory, it was "winglet, L wing, R wing, canard, and fuselage" kit's (there were a bunch, at least 6 subkits). Looks like the website isn't up to date yet.
B
-
I'd be interested in hearing what you find as well, I've not taxied a Cozy, but our XL taxis pretty well if you keep up a bit of speed, at very low speeds she wallows and misses stays, as they say. You don't have to hot rod it, just a brisk walking pace, and an occasional stab on take-off roll.
B
-
You're welcome... btw, I do try to keep a current listing of Velo's (flying and gently-used kits) on the wiki...
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=For_Sale
Brett
-
The twin was hot-n-heavy for awhile, but it's been on the back-burner for some time, and I would be surprised to see it in the next three years. The "hot-rod" is the current development machine, and the RRL ships. And then there's the Turbo, if they're serious about it....
Airventure 2006 Twin prototype
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=Velocity_Models#Twin
Brett
-
Just a couple of adds here to what others have said.
Strake baggage - you really can make this as big or small as you want, in hind sight, I'd probably have made mine a bit smaller.
Other behind-seat storage - also depends on RG or FG, my XL/FG has a very natural storage shelf over the sump, in addition to the behind-seat space. See picture below. Retracts have less usable space back here.
Draggage - There is at least one Velocity with Draggage - http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=Draggage_Pod.
Brett
-
I'm not sure this is supportable, though I can see why it may seem this way.Something I have not yet seen mentioned is surviveability of an off field landing. I think the RV10 will win that one hands down. The high landing speed and the small wheels with high center of gravity (due to pusher prop clearance) tends to mean that you would be very lucky indeed to have an damage free landing on anything other than a long stretch of asphalt. I know that a lot of people have walked away from off field landings but in virtually every case the airplane was destroyed.
I'm still sitting on the fence as you can see....
I know several folks who've landed Velocity XL airplanes off-field with no damage at all, and some with very minimal damage, and they are typically much heavier than Cozys. Now, our wheels are bigger, but we're heavier, taller, and fast. I've collected as many pictures as I could to show how survivable they are on my website http://n44vf.velocityxl.com/building/Accidents.php
Brett
-
Don't know what airport these folks are at, but Paul Stroub has N776TB and lives in Roseville, as does Keith Hallsten with N585V - both Velocitys, but hey, any port in a storm, right?
Brett
-
:ROTFLMAO:Thanks Waiter, a Velo friend of mine described trying a loop in exactly these terms... it worked out, so it's quite funny... now... it took a few weeks to get to funny, though. Be careful out there, folks.If able, get someone to show you how to do this: I can show you in two minutes, and have you successfully do it.
First, make sure you have plenty of altitude (8-10,000 agl, YES that high), because the first time you try this your going to fall out of the top and scare the living bejibers out of yourself as your pointing toward the ground and quickly building up speed.
Waiter
B
-
Yea, my Velocity has two big-a$s NACA holes on top, and two large conduits on the bottom. I added fire block foam to seal the conduit this weekend, not sure what could be done with the NACAs, to be honest.
http://www.velocityxl.com/plenum_split_2.JPG
http://www.velocityxl.com/Oil_Tube_Bracket.JPG |Conduit with oil lines and engine cables
Brett
-
Yep - we'll be arriving either Friday or Saturday before the Show - Kent will setting up the campsite on the Wednesday before, at least hopefully, in the same place. Also will probably be having a group dinner or two, not sure if it'll be a fish fry yet or not.
B
Jet Engines
in Other Modifications
Posted
You might want to talk to X-Jets, they helped Antonio with his installation
http://wiki.velocityxl.com/index.php?title=Espinal_Jet_N289AE
Brett