Jump to content

longezdave

Verified Members
  • Posts

    103
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by longezdave

  1. She lands no problems with or without the landing brake. I just put the trim all the way back on downwind and fly the plane.

    I think you gave us a clue there. I have a Long similar to yours (O-235, Roncz canard) and have never gone full aft on the pitch trim. I do run out of forward pitch trim when racing and have to keep just a little forward pressure on the stick, but never get close to running out of trim at slow speed. I too believe your pitch trim springs are too weak.

     

    I agree with several items mentioned before:

     

    • Do your own W & B.
    • Check the trailing edge position of the elevators ( I can see mine in flight).
    • Check your elevator contour (should be concave on upper surface).
    • Check incidences.

    I don't understand your vibration on the canard. It doesn't sound like flutter, because you would be more excited when talking about flutter experience. I don't understand why the GIB makes that much of a change for you. The GIB is very near the C of G.

     

    Good luck with it,

     

    Dave

  2. I don't like that it's not a green solution, but I too choose to let the blow-by go. I don't want the oil, containing nasty by-products of combustion, to be returned to the engine. I think it is best to let it go or catch it to be disposed of properly. I wish I could find the source, but I have read that oil from the breather tube is not what you want lubricating your engine. Isn't it acidic?

  3. I'm certainly not going to argue with any of the above. I think that the different possible shapes that you could put on your canard tips are going to be very close in performance. Any difference in performance from tip to tip would probably be hard to measure......BUT, I chose to go with the Roncz canard plans curled up tips. In CP 43, page 2, referring to the curled up tips, it says "These tips are specifically optimized to enhance the vortex coming off the tip of the canard and position this vortex in the "sweet spot" over each main wing". With that said, I think the most important thing to do with the tips is......TO GET THEM FINISHED. :)

  4. We had a good race Saturday. There were 18 racers, but I was the only canard. I hope next season some of you give it a try, because it is a lot of fun. I've got the racing bug now.

     

    Here's a link to the results - http://www.sportairrace.org/id247.html

     

    The only problem was that Bruce Hammer had a fairing come loose and had to make a precautionary landing. He ripped it off and got back in the race and ended up being the fifth fastest at over 257 MPH.

     

    My little O-235 was the smallest engine in the race, but I still beat five planes. You have to love the efficiency of these planes!

  5. I'm a little late, but wanted to make sure everybody knows about the race this weekend. It is at Taylor, Texas this saturday 11-22-08. Here's a link to race info - http://www.sportairrace.org/id184.html

     

    I got a taste at racing on my first race last October in Memphis and it is a lot of fun. I hope there will be some other interested canard types come out and help me show the RV guys what we can do - again. It's a good bunch of people and it is well run and safe.

     

    Rick P. is registered with his Long EZ RG and I intend to be there. Come on out and say hi or better yet enter!

  6. A tarp. Good advice. As for fuel, I can always fly somewhere locally for fuel and if there happens to be someone in the back seat when I go, so be it. :)

    I just returned from RR (yearly family re-union) and while I was there, my Father flew with me to get fuel. We flew about 20 miles SW to Ohio Co. (7K4). The fuel was $5.50/gal with a self-serve credit card set-up. This would make for a good dual purpose short trip with a builder or builder/flyer/wannabe to get fuel and let them see what it's like on a SHORT trip in an EZ type.
  7. I gave Bill a heads up that his windows were being discussed in case he wanted to chime in. Here's his response -

     

    Hi Dave-

     

    The following is a brief description of the background on the window. You are welcome to post it if you can. Thanks for the heads up! -Bill

     

     

     

    Side window, N95BJ

     

    During building, structural effect of the window was analyzed with several experienced canard folks. Attributable to CSA.

     

     

     

    The plans emphasize the importance of not encroaching the ten inch fuselage area around the canard bulkhead or main spar, which was not an issue. I would agree with Mark Z’s comments about the relatively small loss of strength.

     

     

     

    However I (we) worked to retain at least normal strength. When building, the wooden longerons were doubled per LongEZ, and then overlayed with seven layers of glass. Around the window, a one inch perimeter of fuselage wall foam was replaced with a “U” frame of seven layers of UNI and BID. That became 14 layer, one inch diameter wall around the window. For a smooth exterior surface the plexiglass pane has a step to compensate for the exterior fuselage skin.

    As for visibility, the pilot’s line of sight parallels the structure between the canopy and window. The one inch thickness of the structure is minimal and is pretty much ignored. A nice capability with the window is to check for opposing traffic in a turn. And when approaching a runway overhead its easier to check ground traffic and the windsock, things which would normally only be visible off to the side.

     

    As was mentioned, the window approximates the thinner glass to glass fuselage area next to the LongEZ stick, providing knuckle room. The side consoles were narrowed about an inch each so the thigh and instrument panel legroom is per LongEZ dimensions. The extended fuel strakes include LongEZ elbow room in the front seat.

     

    Additional local strength is gained by moving the canopy lip aft a couple of inches, with structural attachment of the top of the instrument panel to the top of the fuselage with corner tapes inside and out. This allows more strength around the bulkhead plus an instrument access panel. While there are a few mods on the plane that improve operational friendliness, the airframe is built per plans. After 12 years of flight on the plane I am a happy guy.

     

     

     

    I appreciate the experience and knowledge that you guys and gals instill, cultivate and perpetuate. You are welcome to spend some time reading about 12 years of flying the VariEze on the sites below.

     

     

     

    Bill James, Fort Worth VariEze

     

    Featured Canards on ez.org

     

    EZ Chronicles link on ez.org

     

    http://www.ezchronicles.com/blogger.html

  8. :confused: ..... the cheesecake pages?

    Yeah, I kept hoping it was my flaky internet access and I'd get to see that page, so I racked up a few hits there.

     

    Congrats on starting on the engine (or is it almost starting)!

  9. I can only say that I installed my Roncz canard per plans and it stalls and performs as advertised. I certainly would not recommend using a lower incidence, because it will change the stall characteristics.

     

    Good luck with it.

     

    Dave Adams

    Long EZ N83DT

  10. I have an update on my empty weight after painting and now re-weighing my Long with certified aircraft scales. It is now 885 pounds!!! The huge change from 791 pounds had to be from two things. Naturally the filler and paint made a change, but I'm thinking that I didn't apply 94 pounds of filler and paint. I think the big change was from bathroom scales to certified aircraft scales. Don't use bathroom scales to weigh your aircraft!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information