Jump to content

Drekar

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Drekar

  1. Well, thanks for giving me the info everyone. Just thought you might like to know that I now have a clean garage, and nice big new workbench.

     

    I am really looking forward to the build process, but I must admit it is a little worrysome that nowhere can I find a time estimate for how long it will take to build a Long-EZ. Anyone know what the general consensus is for build time, assuming to-plans and consistent time investment?

     

    Thanks!

     

    -Luke

  2. Thanks a lot for the help! I definitely count myself a Coloradoan, but am currently stationed semi-permanently in Dallas, TX.

     

    I think you are right Remi, the best thing for me is probably to hunt down other builders/flyers and see what they have to show/say!

     

    So far, after a lot of research, it looks like the Long-EZ is indeed more efficient than the RV-9a, moderately. Also, above and beyond the benefits of the canard pusher design, it also has a distinctive edge in initial outlay of cash, and an edge in total build cost. It also appears to be a simpler design (simplicity is definitely a good thing). The downsides, so far are that it is a bit slower of a build, and will be unable to operate out of grass / short strips. It also has a higher landing speed and (by some accounts) is harder to fly than the RV.\

     

    So, it looks to me like I will be building one of the first Open-EZs! Now it is just a matter of finishing my current project (biodiesel refinery) so that I can start on this one.

     

    -Luke

  3. Great! Thank you all for the responses so far. I think i have been officially swayed to do the Long-EZ / Open-EZ (well, that may change, I seem to flip-flop a lot...). Anyone know what the normal "efficient" cruse GPH and airspeed will be in a 0-320 powered Long?

     

    I will be doing a lot of landings at fairly high altitudes (Colorado). Anyone have any experience with the Long-EZ "hot and high"? I know the canard design eats runway, but I am not sure just how much. I actually have family right near Leadville, CO....

     

    Thanks again!!

     

    -Luke

  4. Another question. The RV-9A was originally designed for a 118hp engine (wow, tiny). With that, it has the following characteristics at solo weight

     

    118hp engine RV-9A:

    Top Speed 173 mph

    Cruise [75% @ 8000 ft]

    Cruise [55% @ 8000 ft]

     

    What do you think I could get in the Long with the same engine?

     

    FYI I am 5'9" and 170lbs.

     

    Thanks again, you all are quite helpful!

     

    -Luke

    Ack, I messed up my last post, here it is again:

     

    Another question. The RV-9A was originally designed for a 118hp engine (wow, tiny). With that, it has the following characteristics at solo weight

     

    118hp engine RV-9A:

    Top Speed 173 mph

    Cruise [75% @ 8000 ft] 167 mph

    Cruise [55% @ 8000 ft] 151 mph

     

    What do you think I could get in the Long with the same engine?

     

    FYI I am 5'9" and 170lbs.

     

    Thanks again, you all are quite helpful!

     

    -Luke

  5. Another question. The RV-9A was originally designed for a 118hp engine (wow, tiny). With that, it has the following characteristics at solo weight

     

    118hp engine RV-9A:

    Top Speed 173 mph

    Cruise [75% @ 8000 ft]

    Cruise [55% @ 8000 ft]

     

    What do you think I could get in the Long with the same engine?

     

    FYI I am 5'9" and 170lbs.

     

    Thanks again, you all are quite helpful!

     

    -Luke

  6. So, with an 0-320, does the Long have appreciably better performance than the Cozy (thinner, lighter, etc. I would assume it does)?

     

    If the "sweet spot" of a Cozy is the 360, is there any consensus as to the "sweet spot" on the Long? That would probably give me a good idea of the differences!

     

    Thanks again for any more insight you can give.

     

    -Luke

  7. Please help me oh great sages of Canardia!!

     

    I am having a really tough time deciding which craft is "for me"; the Long-EZ or the Cozy. I just can't seem to find the information I need! I would really appreciate some help as i am really close to plopping down the money for plans.

     

    So, here are my big questions.

     

    1) How small of an engine can I stick in a Cozy, how small in a Long? That might be a huge cost difference in both build and long term costs.

     

    2) How much more complex is the Cozy to build? In particular, will the Long substantially cut down on my build time?

     

    3) Is the Cozy that much more "refined" than the Long? Enough to sway me away from the Long?

     

    4) What are the relative performance numbers assuming the lowest common denominator of engine? Rough figures?

     

    5) Am I forgetting anything ? :D

     

    Things that don't really matter to me:

    Side-by-side seating (I will usually be solo)

    cost of airframe (apparently the difference is negligible)

    Extra two seats (Sure, it would be nice, but if I have to drop in a much larger engine, I would rather just travel light).

     

    Thanks so much for any advice, I am going nuts. If I can't decide soon, I may just go build an RV-9 ;)

     

    - Luke

  8. I am trying to decide between the Cozy or the Open-EZ as well. Is there somewhere i can see a good comparison of their relative strong-points?

     

    I really don't need a 4-seat, and if I can get away with a smaller engine in the Open-EZ, wouldn't that drastically reduce both the build cost and ongoing cost of the plane?

     

    Thanks!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information