Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

Engine Cozy mk3

Engine cocymk3

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Kimjensen

Kimjensen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
  • Kim jensen
  • Aalborg Denmark

Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:38 PM

Hello again

Eny One Who Can give a feedback regarding engines.
I have possibiliti to get a O-320 or a IO-360 for my cozy3

Positive / negative Comments?

#2 Kent Ashton

Kent Ashton

    Member

  • Verified Members
  • 621 posts
  • Kent Ashton
  • Concord, NC

Posted 14 September 2017 - 05:31 PM

I owned a C-III with an O-320 for a while.  It was a good engine and HP for the airplane.  IMO, an IO-360 is too much engine for the design.

 

- A heavier engine and prop is going to require more ballast in the nose when flying solo.  I used 40-50 lbs of shot in my C-III/O-320 when solo.  You'd probably need more with an IO-360.  Aside from the problem of shuttling bags of ballast around, It offsets some of the advantage of the extra HP.

- Ground handling would be trickier.  It would be easier to tip-back.

- The engine mounts (essentially Long-EZ mounts) were designed for an O-235 unless they have been beefed up.  Even if they have, it's a lot of leverage on them with the heavier engine and HP hanging on angles that are about 10-12" apart, vertically.  The C-IV has better mounts, IMO.

- The landing gear (Long-ez gear) is not as strong as the Cozy IV.    Yes, people have put O-360s on the EZs but heavy EZs have problems with the attach angles getting loose.  Some have problems with the strut sagging.  The C-IV has a bigger, stronger MLG strut.

- The bigger engine is useful for takeoff and climb but your cruise will not be that much faster.  You'll get there a few minutes quicker but . . .

- Your range might be less because you burn more GPH. 


Edited by Kent Ashton, 14 September 2017 - 05:32 PM.

-Kent
Cozy IV N13AM-650 hrs, Long-EZ-55 hrs


#3 Voidhawk9

Voidhawk9

    44°24'0"S, 171°15'0"E

  • Verified Members
  • 53 posts
  • Cameron Garner
  • Timaru, New Zealand

Posted 14 September 2017 - 08:47 PM

An O-320 and a lightweight constant speed propeller would sure make it perform!  :cool1:


Aerocanard (modified) SN:ACPB-0226 (Chapter 6)

Canardspeed.com (my build log and more)
X-plane (Flight simulator) Flight Model Master: X-Aerodynamics

(GMT+12)


#4 Kimjensen

Kimjensen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
  • Kim jensen
  • Aalborg Denmark

Posted 15 September 2017 - 01:49 PM

Thank you I Will go for the 320




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Stats